ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
The Public Health problem is an excellent example of the consequences of the cure being worse than the problem that the cure was intended to remedy. Here, the biologic exposure being cured by chlorination is creating toxins and carcinogens with far more dire impact on people than the biologic exposure.
​
And so, the germane questions are will the UMO plants have negative environmental or other consequences? And if so, to what degree?
​
The report to the right which was filed and accepted by the State of Louisiana re our related processing plant in Jennings explores the environmental impact of one of our plants - and the impact is certainly net favorable. As use of our patent-pending technology has proved to reduce GHG per barrel processed (due to lower operating temperatures), there is a reduction of GHG per barrel of offtake produced as producing a barrel of UMO displaces the need to produce a barrel of crude oil though conventional refinery processes.
INITIATIVE DIRECT IMPACT ON ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
.jpeg)
Often, an environmental issue is esoteric. It is abstract. Its relevance to mankind is consequential.
Here, the environmental issue is tangible. It is measurable. It is immediate. Its consequence is truly life or death.
​
The initiative directly addresses the cause for elevated mortality rates of liver and kidney diseases (diabetes, cirrhosis, and cancers) that data clearly reflects are the result of a combination of free bromide in the water supply, and the release of bromide into the bloodstream when various toxins and carcinogens cause by the discarding of used oil are created by the kidneys and liver filtering out these toxins by breaking the chemicals apart.
​
In other words, with every passing day, citizens are receiving additional poisons through the water they consume and through the chemicals absorbed through the skin delivered in the water in which they shower. And these toxins/carcinogens have an accumulative effect. So every passing day, more fatalities are incurred.
​
The graphs below serve to confirm that also with the passing of time, the concentrations of the toxins and carcinogens in the water supply increase, increasing the amount of toxins and carcinogens ingested per glass of water consumed - and as could then be expected, increasing the mortality rates associated with those chemicals.
TAP WATER: EXCESSIVE TOXINS & CARCINOGENS
GALLUP (NM)
SANTA FE (NM)
DETROIT (MI)
GALLUP (NM): IMPACT ON MORTALITY RATES
.jpeg)
The graphs that follow compare 19 disease mortality rates - Gallup (McKinley County) vs U.S. vs New Mexico vs Albuquerque (Bernalillo Country) vs Santa Fe County. Only McKinley County has excessive Bromide in the water supply (naturally occurring) - see graph above. All others in the comparison have similar UMO contamination in their respective water supplies, and all "purify" their drinking water with chlorine or derivative disinfectants. There is a wide disparity in the toxin and carcinogen levels and specific molecules.
The health impact caused by excessive bromide presence in the water being purified is extreme. Fundamentally, the UMO concentration in the water supply determines how much hydrocarbon there is available to produce the toxins/carcinogens. The bromide concentration in the water supply determines how much toxins and carcinogens that are bromine based (most potent toxins and carcinogens) will be produced.
In essence reducing UMO contamination is truly a matter of life or death.
